Thanks to David D. for sending this to me – more bad news for the Modern Golf Swing industry, as it seems more medical researchers are catching up with the snake-oil and bad science of restricted-hip back-torquing.
Now, I don’t know what has taken so long for this to come about – I have blogged about how, with no personal education or experience in the field of kinesiology or biomechanics, I determined very early in my golf swing research that swinging in this manner was not mechanically-sound.
I have never injured myself swinging a golf club, even though I was only ever taught the Modern Golf Swing when I took lessons from two different instructors in the late 90’s, and the modern style of planted-heel swinging was the model I first took up at the outset in 2005.
That’s because, while going back and forth between the lifting leading heel Classic Golf Swing and the planted-heel Modern Golf Swing, I never swung in the Modern style for very long, and by 2008, a sore left knee made me abandon swinging that way altogether.
“It shouldn’t hurt to swing a golf club,” I said to myself, and I rejected it from then on.
But still, let’s look at this article in the UK’s Daily Mail, written by Faith Ridler and entitled:
“Golf is now as bad for participants as a CONTACT sport say experts probing an epidemic of bad backs among professionals”
Some relevant quotes:
Modern golf has triggered an epidemic of back pain among players, according to new research.
A focus on strength over style is making spinal injuries common among both amateurs and professionals.
More than half of those who golf for a living suffer from back injuries, with a third of weekend enthusiasts falling victim to similar conditions…
… The sport is extremely exerting and even endangering to public health, scientists say.
I bolded that 2nd sentence because that is the very essence of contravening the rule of athletic motion – it must me mechanically-sound, because if it is not, it will lead to injuries, and every other sport but golf focuses intensely on mechanically-sound technique to avoid injury.
In golf, the mantra is that people swing all sorts of ways and the there is more than one way to get the ball in the hole.
While I agree with the above premise, I leave the camp where people insist that any type of swing is OK provided you can play and do well with it – and to that, I say, “NO.”
I say so because of the 4th sentence, also in bold.
You must swing mechanically-correctly if you want to reduce the risk of injury a and, if you’re a pro, it’s even more important because professional players need to play to earn money, and a shortened career is a loss of income opportunity.
Anyone teaching or analyzing golf swings who doesn’t see an issue with the 2nd and 4th sentences above should be asking themselves what other “sport” on earth advocates leaving mechanically-sound technique out of the equation when discussing performance.
The answer is, none, of course.
Now, there is a problem with this article – it doesn’t differentiate between the Classic Golf Swing and the Modern Golf Swing, but you know exactly which model they’re talking about when they say things like this:
A golf swing causes the spine to rotate at a tilt repeatedly which then stresses the backbone. This repeated stress has now led to a condition dubbed ‘repetitive traumatic discopathy’ or RTD.
This is further stressed when players participate in intensive strength-training sessions.
During the down swing, greater force is directed toward the spinal disc and joints which makes them crooked.
A previous study of Japanese professional golfers demonstrated this for the first time on X-Ray images.
I would reassure those who swing with a mechanically-sound model that they are not in danger of the above situation.
I have a significant spinal deformity myself (scoliosis), and I was fortunate to have played sports all of my youth – my family doctor told my mother when I was around 10 or 11 years old that, because of my active participation in sports such as track & field, hockey, baseball etc, my back muscles were stronger than the average child’s and that kept my spinal deformity from progressing.
I then took up golf in my mid-20’s, quit over frustration with not being able to learn a proper golf swing after a lifetime of high performing in other sports, and finally, stubbornly, began to study the swing 14 years ago next June, at the age of 35, because I was going to figure it out, come hell or high water.
This was me at 28, less than a year into swing lessons and swinging in the modern style:
I would have wrecked my back and left knee had I continued to play golf with that type of swing, but as I said, I rejected that model early in my research.
And after tens of thousands of swings (I would hit 500-600 balls per day in the season during the first years before I deduced that quality beats quantity), I have had no back issues or injuries, even with scoliosis, because I’ve been swinging with my hips & legs with the Classic Golf Swing, and not by torquing my lower back against restricted hips!
This is what I looked like last May at 48, driving the ball well over 300 yards with ease:
Here are some swing numbers from a session in July of last year:
So, you can swing a golf club without wrecking your back and significantly reducing your joy of the game and quality of life – you just have to do it with mechanical-soundess.
After all, you only have one spine, and if you wreck that, it’s game over, literally.
Back Pain or Back Injury Swinging a Golf Club?
Lacking Power, Speed, Distance and or Consistency?
Need A Swing That Is More Easily Maintained?
If You Answered “Yes” To Any Of The Above Questions, The Answer Is In The Formula For The Golf Swing: